Case 2420053/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Lamey Second Claimant: Ms F Hughes Third Claimant: Ms P Norcombe Fourth Claimant: Ms J Daniel v Renandco Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2420053/2020
- Decision date
- 10 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Lamey Second Claimant: Ms F Hughes Third Claimant: Ms P Norcombe Fourth Claimant: Ms J Daniel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe First, Second, Third and Fourth Claimants each succeeded in holiday pay complaints. The awards were £2,101.77 to the First Claimant, £1,965.77 to the Second Claimant, £1,387.15 to the Third Claimant and £2,242.56 to the Fourth Claimant.
The First Claimant also succeeded in a breach of contract complaint and received £402.54. The Third Claimant also succeeded in a separate breach of contract complaint and received £27.67. The Tribunal further found that the Respondent had failed to provide written statements of terms and conditions under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996, and it made awards under s.38 Employment Act 2002 of two weeks' gross pay to each claimant: £431.20 to the First Claimant, £508.40 to the Second Claimant, £409.84 to the Third Claimant and £299.30 to the Fourth Claimant.
All other claims were not well-founded and were dismissed. The written decision also records the tribunal's standard interest notice: if sums remain unpaid after 14 days, interest may accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at the stipulated rate stated in the notice, but no separate interest figure was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
11 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | First Claimant: complaint of failure to pay holiday pay; gross award of £2,101.77. | Upheld | — | £2,102 |
| Breach of contract | First Claimant: breach of contract complaint; gross award of £402.54. | Upheld | — | £403 |
| Other | First Claimant: failure to provide a statement of terms and conditions under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996; award under s.38 Employment Act 2002 of two weeks' gross pay (£431.20). | Upheld | — | £431 |
| Holiday pay | Second Claimant: complaint of failure to pay holiday pay; gross award of £1,965.77. | Upheld | — | £1,966 |
| Other | Second Claimant: failure to provide a statement of terms and conditions under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996; award under s.38 Employment Act 2002 of two weeks' gross pay (£508.40). | Upheld | — | £508 |
| Holiday pay | Third Claimant: complaint of failure to pay holiday pay; gross award of £1,387.15. | Upheld | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,776
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.