Case 2420067/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Pevitt v Prosperity Capital Partners Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2420067/2020
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Phil Allen. The tribunal found that Miss V Pevitt had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £865.38. It also found that Prosperity Capital Partners Ltd had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement.
As a result, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,586.54 in respect of holiday entitlement. The judgment also recorded that the hearing listed for 5 August 2021 was cancelled. The attached interest notice explained the operation of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but no interest amount was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £865 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £1,587 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,452
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.