Case 2420116/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Potter v St Helens Borough Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 2420116/2020
- Decision date
- 12 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peck
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Potter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Potter brought a claim arising from her term-time employment at Holy Spirit Catholic Primary School, seeking recovery of an alleged shortfall in holiday and pension payments under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The respondent argued that the claim had been presented against the wrong employer because the claimant had named the Governors of Holy Spirit Catholic Primary School rather than St Helens Borough Council, and that the absence of an early conciliation certificate naming the Council was fatal to jurisdiction.
Employment Judge Peck held that the decision in Drake International Systems Ltd v Blue Arrow Ltd applied. The tribunal accepted that there was a mixed employment picture at the school, with some staff employed by the Governors and others, including the claimant, employed by the Council, and that the Council and the Governors were closely linked for the purposes of the matter before the tribunal. The judge concluded that the claimant's failure to identify the Council at the early conciliation stage was not fatal to jurisdiction under section 18A(8).
Applying rule 34, the Selkent principles and the overriding objective, the tribunal substituted St Helens Borough Council for the original respondent. It held that the amendment would not cause undue hardship, delay or evidential prejudice, and that requiring the claimant to start early conciliation again would not serve justice and would create unnecessary expense. The claim was therefore not dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and the matter was stayed until 31 December 2021 for an update from the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held that the claim was not barred by section 18A(8) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, declined to dismiss the claim for want of jurisdiction, and ordered substitution of St Helens Borough Council as respondent under rule 34. No merits determination of the underlying holiday pay or pension dispute was made. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 18A(8) Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- rule 34 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Selkent Bus Company Ltd t/a Stagecoach Selkent v Moore [1996] ICR 836
- rule 2 overriding objective
- Drake International Systems Ltd v Blue Arrow Ltd [2016] ICR 445
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.