Case 2420312/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Munro v Luke Foster (trading as ‘Snackajacks’) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2420312/2020
- Decision date
- 8 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Munro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Luke Foster trading as Snackajacks, did not present a response by the Tribunal's deadline of 12 February 2021. Employment Judge Johnson therefore entered judgment for the claimant, Mr J Munro, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals' Rules of Procedure.
The judgment states that, under Rule 21(2), the claimant had provided sufficient information in the claim form for remedy to be determined. The tribunal therefore found the claim for unlawful deduction from wages successful and ordered the respondent to pay £882 in full and final settlement of the claim.
The hearing listed for 23 April 2021 was postponed. The written record also included the standard notice on tribunal interest, but the judgment itself did not quantify any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a response by 12 February 2021. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had provided sufficient information in the claim form to determine remedy and ordered payment of £882 in full and final settlement of the unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Upheld | — | £882 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £882
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.