Case 2420354/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Amy Park v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police HELD AT: Liverpool — 2023
- Case reference
- 2420354/2020
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
- Panel members
- Mr G Pennie, Mr R Cunningham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Amy Park
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting with Employment Judge Shotter and lay members Mr G Pennie and Mr R Cunningham, unanimously dismissed the claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that claim was not well founded.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claimant's detriment claim under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that claim was not well founded as well. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim brought under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the Tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment claim brought under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the Tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.47B ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.