Case 2420576/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Stone v LT International Ltd and 3 others — 2018
- Case reference
- 2420576/2017
- Decision date
- 22 January 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Ms H Stone
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Rule 21 judgment records that Ms H Stone’s claim succeeded against the second, third and fourth respondents only. The first respondent, LT International Ltd, had been dissolved. The judgment does not set out the substantive findings on the underlying heads of claim in the extracted text, but it does record the overall success against respondents 2 to 4.
The tribunal also stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment. The decision is dated 17 January 2018 and was sent to the parties and entered in the register on 22 January 2018.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual heads of claim. It records only that the claim succeeds against the second, third and fourth respondents, that the first respondent had been dissolved, and that remedy would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.