Case 2420621/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Alam and others (see schedule) v Newco Ventures Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2420621/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Alam and others (see schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were brought under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with the collective consultation requirements in section 188. No response had been presented by the respondent, which was in administration, and the judge determined the matter on the papers under Rule 21 without a hearing.
On the information before the tribunal, the respondent employed over 20 employees at the site where the claimants worked and there was no recognised trade union for collective bargaining, consultation or negotiation. On 9 October 2020 some employees were told that the respondent was closing down and that they were all being made redundant with immediate effect, and they were asked to message other employees to tell them of the redundancies. The company went into administration on that date.
The tribunal found there had been no proper warning, notice or consultation with the workforce, and that no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation under section 188A. It therefore found the respondent in breach of section 188 and made an award under section 189 in favour of the claimants for the maximum protected period of 90 days commencing on 9 October 2020.
The judgment also states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply to the awards. The respondent was directed to provide the Secretary of State with the information required by Regulation 6 within 10 days of promulgation, and payment under the protective awards was not to be made until a recoupment notice, or notification that none would be served, had been received.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 189 of TULRCA 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements. The tribunal found the claim well-founded and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 9 October 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189 TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.