Case 2420706/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Thorley v Arcus FM Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2420706/2020
- Decision date
- 21 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Thorley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing before Judge Brian Doyle on 20 June 2022, the tribunal applied rules 12(1)(b), 12(1)(f) and 12(2A) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and held that the claim may proceed. The judgment directed that there would be a further preliminary hearing to determine the claimant's status as a disabled person, followed by a final hearing.
The tribunal also recorded that the claim against Steven Nielsen was treated as dismissed and that Arcus FM Ltd was substituted as respondent. The judgment did not decide the merits of the unfair dismissal or disability discrimination complaints and did not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records a preliminary procedural decision under rules 12(1)(b), 12(1)(f) and 12(2A) allowing the claim to proceed to a further preliminary hearing and final hearing. It does not determine the substantive unfair dismissal or disability discrimination claims. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 12(1)(b), 12(1)(f) and 12(2A) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.