Case 2420722/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Grogan v Greenbrow Social Club Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2420722/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Grogan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 May 2021, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out because it had not complied with the tribunal's orders sent on 21 January 2021 and had not been actively pursued. The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The employment judge therefore struck out the response. The judgment also records that the respondent had indicated in box 6.1 that it did not intend to defend the claim. The judgment is procedural only and does not determine the underlying claims made by Miss H Grogan.
The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the tribunal, but may participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the employment judge. It also makes clear that the decision does not affect Miss R Dicocco's separate case, number 2420720/2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the respondent's response for non-compliance with tribunal orders and lack of active pursuit. The judgment did not determine the substantive employment claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.