Miss J Lloyd v Rest Assured Limited — 2021

Case reference: 2420724/2020
Decision date: 15 June 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Phil Allen

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss J Lloyd

Respondent

Rest Assured Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Miss J Lloyd's claim against Rest Assured Limited. It recorded that by letter dated 26 April 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. No substantive liability finding or remedy award was made.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 26 April 2021, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.