Case 2421417/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A A Agbonkhina v Solent NHS Trust — 2018
- Case reference
- 2421417/2017
- Decision date
- 28 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Matthews Members
- Venue
- In Chambers
- Panel members
- Mr N Cross, Ms C Earwaker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A A Agbonkhina
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A A Agbonkhina claimed that Solent NHS Trust directly discriminated against her because of race when it rescinded a conditional offer of employment for the role of Community Healthcare Support Worker. The tribunal recorded that an earlier disability discrimination claim had already been dismissed in a separate judgment sent on 28 September 2018, and that this hearing was concerned only with the race claim.
The tribunal preferred the evidence of Ms Garratt on the disputed events. It found that she suggested, rather than insisted on, shadowing; that there was no reliable evidence that Mrs Agbonkhina had forbidden the Trust from contacting Southern Health Foundation Trust; and that the comparator would have been treated in the same way. It also rejected the suggestion that Ms Garratt had insisted on an inappropriate route for obtaining a reference from NHS Professionals. The tribunal accepted that the Trust’s policy required satisfactory references before employment could start, and that the references received from NHS Professionals and Thornbury Nursing Services were inadequate, while no reply was received from Southern Health Foundation Trust.
Applying section 136 of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal held that there were no facts from which it could infer that the offer was withdrawn because of Mrs Agbonkhina’s Black African ethnic origin. It noted that there was scope for confusion and misunderstanding about the status of the references, and that a bystander might have considered allowing more time in light of the Trust’s own reference policy, but it accepted Ms Garratt’s evidence that the decision was made because she considered the process had reached a conclusion and satisfactory references had not been received. The race discrimination claim was dismissed.
The Trust’s costs application was dismissed because the tribunal did not find that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal also directed that the £100 deposit paid by Mrs Agbonkhina as a condition of continuing the claim be returned.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010, based on Black African ethnic origin; dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £100
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 39 Equality Act 2010
- section 136 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.