Case 2423476/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Dennis v Frodsham Sign & Display Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2423476/2017
- Decision date
- 11 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms D Dennis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment by Employment Judge Horne sitting in Liverpool on 22 July 2019. The claimant, Ms D Dennis, was represented by counsel; the respondents did not attend and were not represented. The tribunal recorded that it was acting upon an e-mail from ACAS dated 22 July 2019 and, with the claimant's consent, adjourned the hearing.
The order stated that unless, by 4pm on 19 August 2019, a party applied in writing for the hearing to be re-listed, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed without further order. The judgment does not record any merits determination, findings of fact on the underlying complaint, or any award of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is procedural only. It adjourned the hearing and directed that, unless a party applied in writing by 4pm on 19 August 2019 to re-list the hearing, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed without further order. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.