Case 2423563/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K. Sanders Mrs S. Brankin Mr S. Arthur Miss M. Doherty Mr J. Ramsay Miss S. Akhtar v Mears Homecare Limited and 1 other — 2017
- Case reference
- 2423563/2017
- Decision date
- 19 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss K. Sanders Mrs S. Brankin Mr S. Arthur Miss M. Doherty Mr J. Ramsay Miss S. Akhtar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham before Employment Judge Butler alone, decided the case on 5 August 2019. It found that there was no transfer of undertaking on 19 June 2017 or on any other date from the First Respondent, Mears Homecare Limited, to the Second Respondent, Firstpoint Homecare Limited.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claims against the Second Respondent. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted judgment does not record any monetary award or any split of remedy between claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found there was no transfer of undertaking on 19 June 2017 or any other date from the First Respondent to the Second Respondent, and on that basis the claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.