Case 2423911/2017 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr Craig Taylor (2) Mr Philip Mottershead (3) Mrs Mary – Ann Eyre v Harrison Brothers (Furniture) Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2423911/2017
- Decision date
- 18 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr Craig Taylor (2) Mr Philip Mottershead (3) Mrs Mary – Ann Eyre
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the claims brought by Mr Craig Taylor, Mr Philip Mottershead and Mrs Mary-Ann Eyre against Harrison Brothers (Furniture) Limited and Wendy Etchells Limited, Employment Judge Holmes sitting alone at Manchester on 4 March 2019 recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement. The judgment did not determine liability on the merits and did not record any factual findings about the underlying claims.
The order stayed the proceedings until 8 April 2019 so that the settlement terms could be implemented. It further recorded that, with the consent of the claimants given through counsel and solicitor, the proceedings would then stand dismissed following withdrawal of the claims against both respondents. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Consent judgment recorded agreed settlement; the proceedings were stayed until 8 April 2019 for implementation of those terms, after which they would stand dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | Consent judgment recorded agreed settlement; the proceedings were stayed until 8 April 2019 for implementation of those terms, after which they would stand dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Consent judgment recorded agreed settlement; the proceedings were stayed until 8 April 2019 for implementation of those terms, after which they would stand dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment recorded agreed settlement; the proceedings were stayed until 8 April 2019 for implementation of those terms, after which they would stand dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.