Case 2500006/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Lindsay (1) Mr L Pope (2) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500006/2022
- Decision date
- 18 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Lindsay (1) Mr L Pope (2)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave a remedy judgment after a remote hearing before Employment Judge Morris sitting alone. It held that, for the several claims made by the respective claimants, the calculation of a week's pay was to be made under sections 221(1) and (2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 using the amount payable under each claimant's contract of employment, namely £30,000 per annum.
The tribunal also held that, in the leave year beginning 1 January 2020, it was not reasonably practicable for either claimant to take all of their regulation 13 leave because of the effects of coronavirus, including effects on the worker, employer, wider economy or society. On that basis, each claimant was entitled to carry forward untaken leave under regulation 13(10) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The judgment records no monetary award, no split of sums between claims, and no written reasons because oral reasons were given and no request for written reasons had been made at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The tribunal held that in the leave year commencing 1 January 2020 it was not reasonably practicable for either claimant to take all regulation 13 leave because of the effects of coronavirus, so each was entitled to carry forward untaken leave under regulation 13(10) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- sections 221(1) and (2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 13(10) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.