Case 2500019/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Thompson v Mr D Thompson t/a Thompson Contract Services — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500019/2022
- Decision date
- 19 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Thompson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs H Thompson, was found to have been an employee of the respondent, Mr D Thompson t/a Thompson Contract Services. The tribunal heard the case remotely by CVP on 18 November 2022 before Employment Judge Morris sitting alone.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, brought under section 23, finding that the respondent had not paid her the full amount of her pay for the period 7 August 2020 to 20 August 2021. It ordered payment of £5,396 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's breach of contract complaint, finding that the respondent failed to give the one week's notice of termination required by section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It awarded £144 for that breach.
As to the holiday pay issue under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and/or contract, the tribunal recorded that any award that might have been made on that complaint was incorporated into the £5,396 award. It also noted that the claimant did not pursue the 'No pension paid' matter in her schedule of loss and that any such claim was dismissed. The total award was therefore £5,540, and paragraph 8 states that the £5,396 award was calculated by reference to net pay with any income tax or national insurance liability falling to the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 ERA 1996 for the period 7 August 2020 to 20 August 2021. The award was calculated by reference to net pay; paragraph 8 states any income tax or national insurance liability on that award was the respondent's liability. | Upheld | — | £5,396 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal said that any award that might have been made for the holiday pay complaint under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and/or contract was incorporated into the £5,396 award at paragraph 3, so no separate figure was given. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract because the respondent did not give the claimant one week's notice of termination as required by section 86 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £144 |
| Other | The claimant decided not to pursue the 'No pension paid' matter in the schedule of loss, and the tribunal dismissed any such claim, if there was one. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,540
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.