Case 2500020/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Winter v Tesco plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500020/2025
- Decision date
- 21 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Winter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claims were for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal. Both claims were struck out.
The reason given was that the claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of £100 following a preliminary hearing on 21 May 2025, and the order was sent on 27 May 2025. The claimant failed to pay the deposit, so the complaints were struck out under rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The hearing listed for 3 and 4 December 2025 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination claim was struck out after the claimant failed to pay a £100 deposit ordered following a preliminary hearing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was struck out after the claimant failed to pay a £100 deposit ordered following a preliminary hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.