Case 2500032/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Bell v Allcare Community Care — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500032/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Claimant
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Bell brought a complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations in respect of holiday pay against Allcare Community Care. The respondent did not attend or provide representation. The hearing took place at North Shields Hearing Centre on 15 July 2019 before Employment Judge Martin.
The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and was referred to her last pay slip from the respondent, which set out details of holiday pay. The tribunal found that those sums were not subsequently paid to the claimant. Applying Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, it concluded that the complaint was well founded and ordered the outstanding monies to be paid.
The judgment records an award of £843.00 to the claimant. No separate awards for interest, injury to feelings, or other heads of loss were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations (holiday pay) well founded. It relied on Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the claimant's last payslip showing holiday pay sums that were not subsequently paid. | Upheld | — | £843 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £843
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.