Case 2500038/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dewhurst v Hamilton Capital Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500038/2022
- Decision date
- 11 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dewhurst
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote CVP hearing on 22 August 2022, Employment Judge Robertson held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. The tribunal awarded £39,132 for unfair dismissal, made up of a basic award of £1,632 and a compensatory award of £37,500.
The compensatory award was calculated from financial losses of £29,947.81, increased to £37,434.76 by a 25% uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1992, then grossed up to £39,783 and reduced to the statutory cap of £37,500. The written record notes that an incorrect gross-up figure had been given orally, but the total award was unchanged.
The claimant also succeeded on a claim for 11 days' accrued but untaken holiday entitlement on termination, for which the tribunal ordered payment of £1,267.86 gross. The judgment records that the claimant had not claimed any benefits, so the recoupment regulations did not apply. The remaining claims for arrears of wages, a redundancy payment, notice pay and other payments, brought under claim numbers 2500038/2022 and 2500128/2022, were dismissed upon withdrawal, bringing the total amount payable under the judgment to £40,399.86.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under s111 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The award comprised a basic award of £1,632 and a compensatory award of £37,500. | Upheld | — | £39,132 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for 11 days' accrued but untaken holiday entitlement on termination succeeded. Gross award ordered at £1,267.86. | Upheld | — | £1,268 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Other payment claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £40,400
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,632
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £37,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1992
- statutory cap
- regulation 23
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.