Case 2500053/2022 · Employment Tribunal
A Arkle v Alcyone Healthcare North East Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500053/2022
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Dempsey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Arkle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, A Arkle, presented a claim against Alcyone Healthcare North East Limited, and the Employment Judge amended the respondent's name from "Alcoyne Healthcare North East Limited" to "Alcyone Healthcare North East Limited". The claim was issued in the North East Employment Tribunals on 18 January 2022.
The respondent did not present a valid response in time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,739. No separate breakdown of remedy components was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,739. | Upheld | — | £1,739 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,739
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.