Case 2500054/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Rathbone v Mr George Sowerby and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500054/2022
- Decision date
- 3 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss K Rathbone
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, entered without a hearing because neither respondent filed a response. The claimant had presented her ET1 on 13 January 2022, the first respondent was sent the claim on 19 February 2022, and the second respondent was sent a copy after the claimant produced her contract of employment, which suggested she may have been employed by the second respondent. The tribunal proceeded on the information supplied by the claimant.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. It accepted her evidence that she was owed 1.5 weeks’ wages, paid at £8.91 per hour and averaging 42 hours per week, and assessed the wages element at £561.33.
The tribunal also held that the claim for non-payment of accrued and outstanding holiday pay under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded. On the claimant’s figure of 31.5 hours of holiday pay, multiplied by the hourly rate of £8.91, the tribunal calculated holiday pay at £280.67.
The tribunal awarded a total of £842, comprising £561.33 for wages and £280.67 for holiday pay. The judgment recorded both sums as gross awards and stated that the claimant would be liable for any tax and national insurance payments due on them.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well-founded under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded wages of £561.33 as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £561 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the claim well-founded under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and awarded holiday pay of £280.67 as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £281 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £842
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.