Case 2500058/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Sargeant v North Yorkshire County Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500058/2020
- Decision date
- 25 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Sargeant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 3 December 2021, to make representations or request a hearing on why strike out should not occur.
The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with Order 1 in the tribunal orders sent on 25 November 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing, and therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' for non-compliance with an order and lack of active pursuit. Individual causes of action are not named in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing categories and is therefore lower confidence. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' for non-compliance with an order and lack of active pursuit. Individual causes of action are not named in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing categories and is therefore lower confidence. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' for non-compliance with an order and lack of active pursuit. Individual causes of action are not named in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing categories and is therefore lower confidence. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.