Case 2500061/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Iacob v Mr Oprea-Aurelian Iscru (trading as Artisan Sash Joinery) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500061/2024
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Langridge Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre via CVP video link
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Iacob
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Iacob was employed by Mr Oprea-Aurelian Iscru, trading as Artisan Sash Joinery, from 15 January 2021 until his effective date of termination on 13 October 2023. The claimant gave five weeks' notice, worked the first three weeks and then took two weeks' annual leave. The tribunal recorded that the respondent did not respond to the claim, did not make any contact with the tribunal, and did not attend the hearing.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. It held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in the period between 15 September 2023 and 13 October 2023. The reasons note that the respondent continued to notify HMRC of wages being paid beyond the EDT, had not provided a P45, and had not paid any sum in respect of the wages due for the last five weeks of the claimant's employment.
The claimant's gross weekly wage was recorded as £461.53 before tax and National Insurance. On that basis, and because no payment had been made for the final five weeks, the tribunal held that he was entitled to the full amount claimed. The respondent was ordered to pay £2,307.65, described as the total of the gross sums deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in the period between 15 September 2023 and 13 October 2023, when the claimant's employment ended. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,308
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.