Case 2500062/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Brown v Map Group UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500062/2021
- Decision date
- 23 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote hearing before Employment Judge Moss in which the claimant, Mr C Brown, pursued an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Map Group UK Ltd. The respondent accepted that the deduction from the claimant's wages made in connection with training had reduced his earnings below the National Minimum Wage and ought not to have been made.
By consent, the tribunal stayed the proceedings until midnight on 22 April 2021 to allow the respondent to make settlement of the claim. The order provided that either party could apply to lift the stay before it expired, and that if no application was made the claim would be treated as dismissed on 23 April 2021 without further order. No money award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent accepted that the deduction from the claimant's wages made in connection with training reduced his earnings below the National Minimum Wage and ought not to have been made. The proceedings were stayed by consent pending possible settlement, with dismissal only to follow if neither party applied to lift the stay by midnight on 22 April 2021. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.