Case 2500064/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J.W. Oliver v Pryme Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500064/2019
- Decision date
- 12 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
- Venue
- North Shields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J.W. Oliver
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J.W. Oliver brought claims against Pryme Group Limited for ordinary unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay and breach of contract (loss of earnings). The case was heard at North Shields on 12 April 2019 before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal dismissed each of the claims listed in the judgment. No liability was found on the unfair dismissal claim, the redundancy payment claim, the notice pay claim, the holiday pay claim, or the breach of contract claim identified as loss of earnings.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing. No written reasons were provided, and the judgment records no monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's claim for ordinary unfair dismissal was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant's redundancy payment claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismissed the claimant's notice pay claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismissed the claimant's breach of contract claim described as 'loss of earnings'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.