Case 2500064/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Taylor v Ms A Burns (trading as Niche Hairdressing) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500064/2024
- Decision date
- 22 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Morris, sitting alone at Newcastle Hearing Centre by CVP on 20 December 2024, found the claimant's complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well-founded. The tribunal held that the respondent had on occasions made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages contrary to section 13 of that Act, both by failing to pay the claimant in full for her contractual 30 hours per week and by failing to pay her at the correct apprentice rate of the National Minimum Wage.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,079.92 in respect of the shortfall against contractual hours, and £228.54 in respect of the underpayment against the apprentice National Minimum Wage rate. Each sum was calculated by reference to gross wages, with any liability for income tax or employee National Insurance contributions remaining the claimant's liability alone.
The tribunal further held that the respondent's response to the National Minimum Wage complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and, in accordance with rules 74 to 84 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, made a preparation time order requiring the respondent to pay the claimant £123.00. By consent, the respondent's name was corrected and Amy Burns, previously named as second respondent, was removed from the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Section 23/13 ERA 1996 complaint: on occasions the respondent did not pay the claimant in full in respect of her contractual 30 hours per week. | Upheld | — | £1,080 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Section 23/13 ERA 1996 complaint: respondent did not pay the claimant at the correct apprentice rate of the National Minimum Wage to which she was entitled. | Upheld | — | £229 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,308
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- rules 74 to 84 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.