Case 2500073/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Aslama-Lanjri v Save Your Money Group Limited T/A Save Your Business Money — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500073/2023
- Decision date
- 29 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzpatrick Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Aslama-Lanjri
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing was listed to determine the claimant’s claim for arrears of pay. Neither party attended, and the respondent had not presented a response. The tribunal noted that the claimant had been told in letters dated 1 March 2023 and 15 March 2023 to quantify the claim and provide relevant evidence, but he did not reply.
The claimant’s claim form said he had signed a contract of employment, was due to start work on 10 October 2022, and was later ignored and blocked without being paid. The tribunal recorded that his actual start date and the date he understood his employment ended were unclear. It also noted that he had not provided the contract or other evidence referred to in the claim form.
Applying Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and noting the need to act fairly and justly under Rule 2, the tribunal was satisfied that practicable enquiries had been made into the claimant’s absence and that no explanation had been given. It further held that the claimant bore the burden of proving his loss and had not produced sufficient evidence to show what payment he was entitled to. The claim was therefore dismissed under Rule 47.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was for arrears of pay / unpaid salary. The tribunal dismissed it under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend, did not respond to requests to quantify the claim or provide evidence, and had not supplied the contract or other material needed to prove entitlement and loss. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.