Case 2500074/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Walduck v Mr J Higginson — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500074/2021
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Walduck
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 merits judgment, Employment Judge Arullendran found that Ms J Walduck's claims for unfair dismissal, a redundancy payment, and holiday pay under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 were all well-founded. The judgment records those findings without further reasons or factual detail.
The judgment did not determine compensation. It states that compensation for the three claims would be decided at a remedy hearing listed for 20 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment: the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal was found to be well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment: the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment was found to be well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Rule 21 judgment: the claimant's claim under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for holiday pay was found to be well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.