Case 2500075/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Hooton v Brewhouse Coffee Shops and Restaurants Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500075/2022
- Decision date
- 25 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Hooton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Hooton brought complaints arising out of the termination of her employment by Brewhouse Coffee Shops and Restaurants Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation). Employment Judge Morris, sitting alone at a remote hearing on 23 March 2022, upheld all three claims before the tribunal: breach of contract, holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998, and unauthorised deduction from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On the breach of contract claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to give the claimant the seven weeks' notice of termination to which she was entitled under her contract and section 86 ERA 1996. The tribunal awarded £1,540 for that breach, calculated by reference to the claimant's net pay, with any income tax or national insurance liability to be borne by the respondent.
On the holiday claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had not paid compensation for holiday entitlement that had accrued but remained untaken at the end of employment, contrary to regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal awarded £486 for that element, calculated by reference to gross pay, with any employee national insurance liability to be borne by the claimant. On the wages claim, the tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay the claimant at all for the final 18 weeks of employment, from 8 October 2021 until notification of dismissal on 11 February 2022, and ordered payment of £4,009.50, also calculated by reference to gross pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the respondent was in breach of contract by not giving seven weeks' notice of termination, as required by the contract and section 86 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,540 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid compensation for accrued but untaken paid holiday at termination, contrary to regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £486 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent did not pay the claimant at all for the final 18 weeks of employment, from 8 October 2021 until dismissal was notified on 11 February 2022. | Upheld | — | £4,010 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,036
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 86 ERA 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 23 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.