Case 2500090/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Mattinson v Engenera Renewables Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500090/2024
- Decision date
- 2 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Mattinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss A Mattinson's claim against Engenera Renewables Limited. The judgment records that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to continue, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 15 August 2024 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination on liability or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out because the respondent company was in administration and neither the Administrator's consent nor court permission had been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986, and because the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason after being invited to do so on 15 August 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.