Case 2500091/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Whinham v Banner Contracts (Halnaby) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500091/2021
- Decision date
- 12 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Members
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Whinham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr D Whinham brought claims against Banner Contracts (Halnaby) Ltd for unfair dismissal, breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and unlawful deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay. The hearing took place by CVP at Newcastle on 11 and 12 August 2021 before Employment Judge Newburn, with no lay members named in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claim was brought pursuant to section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was brought under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 in respect of notice pay and was found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records a claim for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay, dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.