Case 2500094/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Arkley v Northern Productions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500094/2021
- Decision date
- 20 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Arkley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of £100, comprising £50 for each of the disability discrimination and age discrimination complaints, following a preliminary hearing on 20 September 2021. The order was sent to the claimant on 21 September 2021.
The claimant failed to pay the deposit. The tribunal therefore struck out the disability discrimination and age discrimination complaints under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 7 and 8 February 2022 remained listed to be heard by an Employment Judge sitting without members.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The complaint was struck out because the claimant failed to pay the deposit ordered in respect of it. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The complaint was struck out because the claimant failed to pay the deposit ordered in respect of it. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.