Case 2500095/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Bruce v Crown and Country Leisure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500095/2022
- Decision date
- 1 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Bruce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Bruce worked as a cleaner at The Chilton Country pub from 10 February 2006. The tribunal found that when new owners took over on 11 February 2020 there was a relevant transfer under TUPE to Crown and Country Leisure Limited, and that her employment continued through that transfer. She was furloughed in March 2020, returned to work on 22 July 2020, was furloughed again in November 2020, and on 25 June 2021 received an email saying the respondent was insolvent and that she was being made redundant.
At the hearing Mrs Bruce withdrew the unfair dismissal, notice pay, unauthorised deduction of wages, and holiday pay claims, and those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The tribunal then considered the statutory redundancy payment claim only. It found that the pub had closed, that there was a redundancy situation for the purposes of section 139 ERA 1996, and that Mrs Bruce had 15 complete years of continuous employment at the date of termination. Her average gross weekly pay in the relevant 12 weeks was found to be £263.15.
The tribunal also considered timeliness under section 164 ERA 1996. It found that the events referred to in section 164(1) had not occurred within six months of the relevant date, but exercised its discretion under section 164(2) on the basis that Mrs Bruce had made genuine attempts to understand the process, did not understand how to secure payment, genuinely waited for a CN number, and was due a redundancy payment. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,920.87 as a statutory redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in a redundancy situation on 25 June 2021, accepted that there had been a relevant transfer under TUPE on 11 February 2020, and exercised its discretion under section 164(2) ERA 1996 because the statutory steps had not been completed within six months. | Upheld | — | £5,921 |
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Notice pay claim withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed upon withdrawal; the judgment does not specify a distinct legal label beyond notice pay. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,921
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 164(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 164(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 139 Employment Rights Act 1996
- TUPE 2006 relevant transfer
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.