Case 2500104/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Shaw v Connaught Associates Limited Heard by Video at Newcastle Upon Tyne — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500104/2022
- Decision date
- 8 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Dempsey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Shaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by video at Newcastle Upon Tyne on 8 April 2022 before Employment Judge O’Dempsey. The respondent did not attend, and the judgment records that liability had already been entered against Connaught Associates Limited by way of a rule 21 judgment.
On that basis, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant, Miss O Shaw, £4,175 by way of compensation. The written record does not set out separate findings on the underlying facts, nor does it break the award into component heads of loss.
The judgment states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further reasoning is contained in the written record beyond the liability position and the amount awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gov.uk listing category was unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment records that liability had already been entered and orders the respondent to pay £4,175 by way of compensation. | Upheld | — | £4,175 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,175
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,175
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.