Case 2500106/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Kim Rowntree v Ceejay Construction Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500106/2025
- Decision date
- 18 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Robertson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Kim Rowntree
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Kim Rowntree brought claims of unauthorised deductions from wages, holiday pay, and a statutory redundancy payment against Ceejay Construction Limited. The matter was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal via CVP on 18 November 2025 before Employment Judge L Robertson. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent did not appear and was not represented.
The Tribunal found the unauthorised deductions complaint well-founded, with deductions made in the period 28 October 2024 to 7 February 2025, and ordered the respondent to pay £6,300 gross. The holiday pay complaint was also well-founded; the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday on the date employment ended, and was ordered to pay £268.80. Under s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996 the claimant was determined to be entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,670.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages claim succeeded for the period 28 October 2024 to 7 February 2025. The respondent ordered to pay £6,300 gross. | Upheld | — | £6,300 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay complaint succeeded. The respondent failed to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date the claimant's employment ended. Ordered to pay £268.80. | Upheld | — | £269 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment determined under s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant is entitled to £5,670. | Upheld | — | £5,670 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,239
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.