Case 2500108/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Smith v Ceejay Construction Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500108/2025
- Decision date
- 18 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Robertson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the hearing took place at Newcastle Employment Tribunal by CVP on 18 November 2025 before Employment Judge L Robertson. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent had no appearance or representation.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim is dismissed. The written record gives no written reasons, no monetary award, and no further findings because reasons were given orally and written reasons would only be provided on request.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment states only that the claimant's claim is dismissed. The gov.uk listing categories identify Unlawful Deduction from Wages, but no written reasons or further detail are provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment states only that the claimant's claim is dismissed. The gov.uk listing categories identify Working Time Regulations, but no written reasons or further detail are provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.