Case 2500109/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr KDP Castro v Birra 1 Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500109/2024
- Decision date
- 3 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr KDP Castro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent’s name to Birra 1 Limited. It found that the claimant had suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages in September 2023, and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted of £162.24. The claimant was recorded as responsible for any tax or national insurance due on that sum.
The tribunal also found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay holiday pay for holidays accrued but untaken when the claimant’s employment ended. It ordered payment of £346.98, again with the claimant responsible for any tax or national insurance. The total award was £509.22.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in September 2023 and awarded the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £162 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £347 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £509
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.