Case 2500110/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs N Tingle v Anchor Hanover Group — 2020

Case reference: 2500110/2020
Decision date: 9 April 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Johnson Representation
Venue: Newcastle Hearing Centre

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs N Tingle

Respondent

Anchor Hanover Group

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal, automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures, automatic unfair dismissal relating to health and safety matters brought to the employer's attention, and breach of contract for failure to pay notice pay.

The judgment records that all of those complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No remedy or monetary award was made, and no substantive reasons or legal tests were set out.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states this complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Whistleblowing	Described in the judgment as automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Other	Described in the judgment as automatic unfair dismissal for bringing to the employer's attention circumstances relating to health and safety; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Breach of contract	Described in the judgment as breach of contract for failure to pay notice pay; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.