Case 2500120/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Kabwe v The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500120/2019
- Decision date
- 16 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Kabwe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short Rule 52 withdrawal order. Employment Judge Deeley recorded that the proceedings brought by Mr M Kabwe against The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim.
The judgment contains no merits findings, no liability analysis, and no remedy award. It does not identify any hearing evidence or explain the background to the withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The type is taken from the case listing category; the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded particulars. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The type is taken from the case listing category; the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.