Case 2500122/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Birchall v Cook and Turnbull Contractors Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500122/2023
- Decision date
- 14 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Birchall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Birchall was employed by Cook and Turnbull Contractors Ltd from 12 June 2017 until 5 December 2022, when he was dismissed without notice by reason of redundancy. He presented a claim on 22 January 2023 for a redundancy payment, notice pay and outstanding holiday pay. The respondent did not present a response, and the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the material available.
The tribunal was satisfied that it had enough information to determine the claims. At the date of dismissal, the claimant had 5 complete years' continuous service and was 66 years old. His gross weekly pay was found to be £546 and his net weekly pay £484. On that basis, the tribunal held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £4,095, calculated as £546 x 1.5 x 5.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had accrued 7 days' untaken holiday at the date of dismissal, equivalent to £764.40, using a daily rate of £109.20. In relation to notice, the tribunal accepted that he was entitled to 5 weeks' notice and awarded £2,420 in damages for the failure to give that notice. The total amount ordered to be paid was £7,279.40, and the hearing listed for 19 April 2023 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the statutory redundancy payment claim well founded under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £4,095. | Upheld | — | £4,095 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the accrued but untaken holiday pay claim well founded under Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations and ordered payment of £764.40. | Upheld | — | £764 |
| Breach of contract | The claim form sought notice pay as wrongful dismissal, but the judgment treated the claim as breach of contract for failure to give five weeks' notice and awarded £2,420. | Upheld | — | £2,420 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,279
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.