Case 2500124/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A Yuill v Halo Hair Group Darlington Ltd HELD AT: Newcastle, by video — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500124/2025
- Decision date
- 30 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Yuill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for November 2025 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted.
The Tribunal also found that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and that the deduction related to November 2025 wages. | Upheld | — | £1,692 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded and concerned accrued but untaken holiday at the end of employment. | Upheld | — | £615 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,307
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.