Case 2500128/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L McCarthy v Little Haven Beach Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500128/2021
- Decision date
- 26 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L McCarthy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L McCarthy was employed by Little Haven Beach Ltd as an accounts assistant from 3 November 2003 until 4 September 2020. Her employment ended by reason of redundancy, and she was not paid any statutory redundancy payment. The respondent was properly served but did not present a response, so the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the available material, the tribunal was satisfied that a determination could properly be made without a hearing and that the statutory redundancy payment claim was due. It found that at the date of termination the claimant's gross weekly pay was £365.39, that she had 16 complete years' service, and that she was aged 49 at dismissal. The judgment records the statutory redundancy calculation as £4,384.68 plus £2,923.12, producing a total of £7,307.80.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claim for a statutory redundancy payment well founded and ordered payment of £7,307.80. | Upheld | — | £7,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,308
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.