Case 2500129/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss SJ Browne v Department for Work and Pensions — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500129/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss SJ Browne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew complaints described as victimization contrary to section 26 Equality Act, unfavourable treatment contrary to section 15, and failure to make reasonable adjustments contrary to sections 20-21.
Following that withdrawal, the tribunal dismissed those complaints under a Judgment on Withdrawal. The judgment does not set out factual findings on the merits or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment contrary to section 15 Equality Act dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the complaint of victimization contrary to section 26 Equality Act was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The statutory reference appears unclear in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments contrary to sections 20-21 Equality Act dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 26 Equality Act
- section 15 Equality Act
- sections 20-21 Equality Act
- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.