Case 2500137/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss DG Lincan v Connaught Associates Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500137/2022
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss DG Lincan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss DG Lincan, presented her ET1 on 1 February 2022. The Tribunal sent the claim to Connaught Associates Limited on 14 February 2022, the response deadline passed on 14 March 2022, and no response was received. The Tribunal therefore entered judgment on the papers under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. This judgment dealt with liability only; the amount of compensation was left to be determined at the hearing listed for 19 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Liability judgment under Rule 21; the amount of compensation was to be determined at the hearing listed for 19 April 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.