Case 2500145/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ian Newbury v Wood Group UK Ltd PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500145/2021
- Decision date
- 19 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney At
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ian Newbury
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Sweeney on 19 August 2021. The only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal brought by Ian Newbury against Wood Group UK Ltd.
The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. As a result, the proceedings were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The proceedings were dismissed accordingly. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.