Case 2500145/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No appearance or — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500145/2022
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not appear or have representation at the hearing. Employment Judge Loy ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £36,165.84.
The award comprised unpaid salary, unpaid notice pay, unpaid accrued holiday pay, unpaid car allowance, unpaid expenses, and pension payments deducted from the claimant's salary but not paid into the pension scheme. The judgment records the monetary components but does not provide written reasons, as reasons were given orally and written reasons would only be provided on request.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £3,015 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award includes unpaid salary (£2,153.84), unpaid car allowance (£153.84), and pension payments deducted from salary but not paid into the pension scheme (£1,467.69). | Upheld | — | £3,775 |
| Breach of contract | Award includes unpaid notice pay (£28,000) and unpaid expenses (£1,375.10). | Upheld | — | £29,375 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £36,166
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.