Case 2500145/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Varley v RDT European Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500145/2023
- Decision date
- 13 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Varley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on liability only. The claimant, Mr J Varley, brought a claim for unfair dismissal against RDT European Limited. The respondent did not file a response by the deadline, and the tribunal entered judgment on the basis of the information provided on the ET1 form.
The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim pursuant to section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. The respondent's title was amended in the judgment to RTD European Limited. Compensation was not determined in this decision and was instead listed to be decided at the hearing on 30 May 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. The amount of compensation was left to be decided at the hearing listed for 30 May 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.