Case 2500147/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Moluluo v Star Meats Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500147/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Moluluo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a response. On the information available to the tribunal, the listed complaints were found to be well-founded and to succeed. The tribunal made a separate award for notice pay, holiday pay, and redundancy payment.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,466.00 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £2,143.68 gross in respect of accrued holiday pay.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and ordered a redundancy payment of £2,625.00. The unfair dismissal complaint was also found well-founded and succeeded, but the claimant’s entitlement to a remedy for unfair dismissal was postponed to a date to be fixed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy; a redundancy payment of £2,625.00 was ordered. | Upheld | — | £2,625 |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded, but the claimant’s entitlement to a remedy was postponed to a date to be fixed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages ordered in the gross sum of £4,466.00. | Upheld | — | £4,466 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement; accrued holiday pay of £2,143.68 was ordered. | Upheld | — | £2,144 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,235
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.