Case 2500150/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Keech v The Portland Ashington Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500150/2022
- Decision date
- 20 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Keech
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K Keech's claim for (constructive) unfair dismissal under s111 Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well-founded. The Tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,871.10 and a compensatory award of £6,051.92. The written record notes that the Respondent did not appear or have representation, and that the judgment was issued under Rule 21.
The Tribunal also found her claim for payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement on termination under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 well-founded, and ordered payment of £1,378.32 gross. In addition, it awarded £712.80 under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failures to provide written statements of employment particulars and of subsequent changes.
The total amount ordered to be paid to the Claimant was £10,014.14. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and are not set out in the published written decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records a claim for (constructive) unfair dismissal under s111 Employment Rights Act 1996. The Tribunal found it well-founded and awarded a basic award of £1,871.10 and a compensatory award of £6,051.92. | Upheld | — | £7,923 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement on termination under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The Tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,378.32. | Upheld | — | £1,378 |
| Other | Additional compensation awarded under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failures to provide written statements of employment particulars and of subsequent changes. The award was £712.80, described as four weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £713 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,014
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,871
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,052
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.