Case 2500176/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Volans v Save Your Money Group Limited HELD by CVP at Newcastle CFCTC — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500176/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Volans
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Miss Volans’s complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded. It awarded £2,569.20 for wages unlawfully deducted and recorded that the sum was gross, with the respondent responsible for any income tax and national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unlawful deduction from wages in respect of wages unlawfully deducted; awarded as a gross sum, with the respondent responsible for income tax and national insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £2,569 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unlawful deduction from wages for failure to pay accrued holiday pay; awarded as a gross sum, with the respondent responsible for income tax and national insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £519 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract succeeded; compensation awarded in this amount. | Upheld | — | £2,420 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,558
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.